Written by Question
One question: In terms of the changes ‘predicted’ for humanity, knowing they don’t happen in a linear fashion, my feeling is that we are rapidly approaching a major shift. But in global terms this could mean 10, 20, 30 or more years. Is that right?
Or can we expect to see fundamental changes in the next few years? It seems that the critical mass has been achieved, but on the other hand your books suggest that the controlling structures are preparing too for a long-term domination.
And finally, could you help clarifying this quote? A few of us couldn’t agree as to its meaning:
“Those who agree with you are insane. Those who do not agree with you are in power.”
Philip K. Dick
Answer
Dear Friend,
We welcome your communication. As you say, the importance here is of timing. Timing is also a much localized phenomena, and efforts are established to align with these timings. As to the questions:
- There are timings also in relation to the ‘shifts’ – regarding these, they are not ‘set in stone’ for certain impacts can create changes in reference to the timing and severity of the shifts. We say this: there are long term shifts in play – these are related also to cosmic situations. Expect these to occur over decades upon this planet. There are also shifts expected in correspondence to localized conditions. Some of these are being affected through human involvement. Yes, there are events that are rapidly approaching. We sense that major changes can be expected within the upcoming years. Some of these localized changes are being put into play to mitigate expected cosmic effects. Cosmic effects are necessary for human evolvement. We say, there are planet-related and cosmic-related forthcoming changes that both align with different cycles/timing. A critical mass has been achieved, yet this will not erase all incoming changes; but re-distribute impacts.
- The quote that we used: “Those who agree with you are insane. Those who do not agree with you are in power.” The first part represents the ‘society perspective’ – those in agreement will, like you, be categorized as ‘insane’ by your dominant social conditioning structures, as a way to stigmatize you. Those who disagree with you are those who perpetuate the dominant conditioning structures, for they are in power and this keeps them so. Is this now clearer?
In Gratitude,
KSP